Let talk a bit more about the statement $p \to q$ (= "$p$ implies $q$" = "if $p$, then $q$".)
There is a relationship between $p \to q$ and the statements $q \to p$, $\neg p \to \neg q$, and $\neg q \to \neg p$:
The statement: | is called the: |
---|---|
$q \to p$ | converse of the statement $p \to q$. |
$\neg p \to \neg q$ | inverse of the statement $p \to q$. |
$\neg q \to \neg p$ | contrapositive of the statement $p \to q$. |
We will soon see that $p \to q$ is equivalent to its contrapositive statement $\neg q \to \neg p$, but isn't necessarily equal to the converse statement $q \to p$. [Note that the converse: $q \to p$, however, is, equivalent to the inverse: $\neg p \to \neg q$.]
By saying 'equivalent', we mean that the two statements have the same truth value, no matter what the truth values of the individual statements $p$ and $q$ are. In other words, $\neg q \to \neg p$ is just another way to say $p \to q$ and vice versa.